AC google-analytics-and-search-improve
Understand website goals and user journeys first, then analyze GSC/GA4 data and audit the live site to validate whether users behave as intended. Identify gaps between goals and reality, and produce actionable, goal-aligned improvement plans. Use when user wants to diagnose website problems, improve search rankings, optimize traffic, analyze Google Analytics or Search Console data, audit website performance, or create a data-backed improvement roadmap.
As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/data-collection-reference.md:199Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (documentation of a security skill)curl -s "${PSI_BASE}&strategy=mobile${PSI_KEY_PARAM}" > "$DATA_DIR/data/psi_mobile.json"security skill -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/data-collection-reference.md:200Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (documentation of a security skill)curl -s "${PSI_BASE}&strategy=desktop${PSI_KEY_PARAM}" > "$DATA_DIR/data/psi_desktop.json"security skill
Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4799 tokens
- 100Steps. 39 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 456: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 18 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)
- +3All 8 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.