AC cn-security-code-resolver
Resolve A-share stocks, ETFs, funds, and other mainland China securities from Chinese names into tradable codes using Eastmoney search. This skill should be used when a user asks for a security code, ticker, exchange suffix, or wants a portfolio file enriched with Chinese market instrument codes.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (cn-security-code-resolver) differs from the folder (cn-security-code-resolver-openclaw-skill)
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 34 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 868 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 297: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 95.