BC self-reflection
Periodic self-reflection on recent sessions. Analyzes what went well, what went wrong, and writes concise, actionable insights to the appropriate workspace files. Designed to run as a cron job.
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: self-reflection (ClawHub)
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug"
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (self-reflection) differs from the folder (agent-self-reflection-1-0-0)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 49 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1115 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 193: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 18 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 49 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is transparent about self-reflection, but it can read recent conversations and make lasting memory or instruction changes without a review step.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026