AC mu-excel-toolbox
Excel全能工具箱:读写、预览、合并、拆分、关联、去重、清洗、校验、模板填充、样式、条件格式、公式、图表、透视表、数据分析、差异对比、图片插入、密码保护。典型场景:月度业务报表合并汇总、HR花名册/考勤表关联清洗、运营数据透视分析、绩效数据校验去重、批量生成offer/通知模板、薪酬表加密保护、业务周报图表生成。触发词:Excel、表格、xlsx、csv、电子表格、合并Excel、拆分Excel、Excel图表、数据透视表、Excel公式、条件格式、数据清洗、Excel模板、Excel对比、Excel加密、VLOOKUP、去重、数据校验、统计分析、格式转换、业务报表、花名册、考勤表、绩效数据、运营数据、excel toolbox、spreadsheet、merge excel、split excel、excel chart、pivot table。即使用户没有明说'用Excel工具箱',只要涉及Excel/表格/xlsx/csv文件的操作都应触发。不适用:在线协作编辑(用Google Sheets等在线工具)、纯代码开发、Skill管理。
Excel全能工具箱:读写、预览、合并、拆分、关联、去重、清洗、校验、模板填充、样式、条件格式、公式、图表、透视表、数据分析、差异对比、图片插入、密码保护。典型场景:月度业务报表合并汇总、HR花名册/考勤表关联清洗、运营数据透视分析、绩效数据校验去重、批量生成offer/通知模板、薪酬表加密保护、业务周报图表生成。触…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 31. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "visibility"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 26 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 968 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -222 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 477: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
- +3All 20 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.