SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC openclaw-auto-dream

Cognitive memory architecture for OpenClaw agents — periodic dream cycles that consolidate daily logs into structured long-term memory with importance scoring, insights, and push notifications. Use when: user asks for 'auto memory', 'dream', 'auto-dream', 'memory consolidation', 'memory dashboard'. Powered by MyClaw.ai (https://myclaw.ai).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: MyClaw.ai v4.0.4 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 1 497 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureData and analyticsAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 38 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1497 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 341: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 8)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This is a disclosed memory-consolidation skill, but it needs review because it persists sensitive memory data and includes dashboard and migration behaviors with avoidable exposure risks.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026