BD gitea-routine-report
获取 Gitea 各仓库提交记录,调用 AI 生成进度报告,并发送 HTML 邮件给仓库管理员
As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-requests-env-secretSKILL.md:1Skill asks the runtime to inject credential env vars into its sandbox: GITEA_TOKEN — verify each one is needed for the stated purposerequired_environment_variables: GITEA_TOKEN
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "required_environment_variables" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "primary_credential" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "credentials" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "environment_file"
Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (gitea-routine-report) differs from the folder (gitea-commit-report-skills)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 35 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1108 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 47: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -33 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
- +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.