SKILLEMALL.ai

BC framework-analysis

基于钱学森"框架法"的系统科学分析工具。用于对地缘政治冲突、国际危机、历史事件等复杂系统进行结构化终局推导。 核心方法论来自钱学森《用系统科学方法使历史科学定量化》: 1. 建立结构性约束框架(不是列出因素,而是找到不会变的硬条件) 2. 填入经过验证的事实 3. 通过因果链推导唯一结论(不做情景列举,不做概率分布) 4. 给出可证伪预测 当用户提到:框架法分析、终局推导、钱学森方法论、系统科学分析地缘事件、结构性约束分析时使用此 skill。 不在用户仅提到"分析一下XX"等模糊请求时激活(可能只需要普通搜索或调研)。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: mydearzsy v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 633 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 25 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 633 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 263: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mainly an analysis framework, but it automatically creates report files and sends them through Feishu without a clear per-use confirmation step.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026