SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC medical-device-code-review

医疗设备软件代码审核（符合IEC 62304、NMPA中国医疗器械注册要求）。当用户要求审核代码、审查代码、代码检查、代码安全审查、代码质量审查、代码合规检查、代码安全审计、代码评审、code review、代码审查、审核这段代码、帮我看看代码、有bug吗、代码有问题吗等关键词时触发。适用于手术机器人、监护仪、输液泵等二类、三类医疗器械软件，以及任何涉及患者安全的医疗设备软件。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: myjnathan v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 670 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
97
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 3

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 3
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/fda-cybersecurity.md:57
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - Penetration testing (for higher risk)
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/owasp-medical.md:8
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | 2 | Insufficient Authentication/Authorization | Weak auth, privilege escalation |
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/owasp-medical.md:111
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    ### Penetration Testing

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 67 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 670 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 190: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 67 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a documentation-only medical-device code review checklist, with no executable code, persistence, credential use, or data-sharing behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026