BC DeFi Audit & Smart Contract Bounty Triage
Smart contract audit and DeFi security triage skill for Solidity, EVM protocols, bug bounty programs, Code4rena, Sherlock, and HackenProof. Maps attack surface, prioritizes vulnerabilities, and generates a structured audit checklist/report.
As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
AnalyzerData and analyticsSecurityInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 8
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 8
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityREADME.md:7Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)Keywords: smart contract audit, DeFi audit, Solidity audit, EVM security, vulnerability scanner, bug bounty, Code4rena, Sherlock, HackenProof.
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill-card.md:2Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Smart contract audit and DeFi security triage skill for Solidity, EVM protocols, bug bounty programs, Code4rena, Sherlock, and HackenProof. <br>
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill-card.md:14Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)External smart contract auditors, DeFi security researchers, and bug bounty participants use this skill to map Solidity/EVM attack surface, prioritize vulnerability classes, and draft a first-pass aud
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:5Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)description: Smart contract audit and DeFi security triage skill for Solidity, EVM protocols, bug bounty programs, Code4rena, Sherlock, and HackenProof. Maps attack surface, prioritizes vulnerabilitie
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:37Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- bug bounty target prioritization
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:45Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)A lightweight **smart contract audit** and **DeFi security triage** skill for Solidity/EVM protocols, bug bounty hunters, Code4rena wardens, Sherlock auditors, and HackenProof researchers.
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:60Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Solidity bug bounty workflow
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:68Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- bug bounty report template
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "changelog"
Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (DeFi Audit & Smart Contract Bounty Triage) differs from the folder (atlas-bounty-triage)
- 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 61 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1815 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 240: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 61 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a text-only smart contract audit checklist skill with no hidden execution, credential access, or persistence.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026