SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB DeFi Audit Workflow

Exact-match DeFi audit workflow for Solidity and EVM protocols. Use for DeFi audit, DeFi security review, smart contract audit, oracle manipulation checks, reentrancy review, access control review, accounting invariant triage, and bug bounty report prep.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: n8gendegen v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 791 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

AnalyzerInfrastructureData and analyticsFinancetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 5

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 5
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security skill-card.md:2
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      Exact-match DeFi audit workflow for Solidity and EVM protocols. Use for DeFi audit, DeFi security review, smart contract audit, oracle manipulation checks, reentrancy review, access control review, ac
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security skill-card.md:14
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      Developers, security reviewers, and bug bounty participants use this skill to map Solidity and EVM protocol attack surface, prioritize high-risk contracts, and produce a first-pass DeFi security check
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:5
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      description: Exact-match DeFi audit workflow for Solidity and EVM protocols. Use for DeFi audit, DeFi security review, smart contract audit, oracle manipulation checks, reentrancy review, access contr
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:44
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      A practical **DeFi audit workflow** for quickly reviewing Solidity/EVM protocols before a deeper manual audit or bug bounty sprint.
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:77
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - bug bounty triage

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "changelog"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (DeFi Audit Workflow) differs from the folder (defi-audit-workflow)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 48 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 791 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 254: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a text-only DeFi audit checklist with a disclosed paid-pack link and no code, install hooks, credentials, persistence, or privileged access.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026