BB Content Calendar Planner with AI-powered Content Scheduling & Google Calendar Integration
Generate optimized 30/60/90-day content calendars by analyzing brand voice, industry trends, and engagement data. Use when the user needs content strategy planning, editorial calendars, or campaign scheduling for solopreneurs and agencies.
As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency, progress reporting
IntegrationPersonal productivityMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
name-longname is longer than 64 chars - warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Content Calendar Planner with AI-powered Content Scheduling & Google Calendar Integration) differs from the folder (ai-powered-content-calendar-planner)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 87 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3826 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 239: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 35 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 87 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is an instruction-only content planning skill whose requested analytics and AI access fits its stated purpose, with no evidence of hidden execution or destructive behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026