BC Map Content Dependencies Across Multiple Sources Automatically
Map hidden dependencies across your content library to identify critical assets, orphaned content, and strategic clusters. Use when the user needs content audit insights, editorial prioritization, or content fragility analysis for strategic planning.
Map hidden dependencies across your content library to identify critical assets, orphaned content, and strategic clusters.
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, consistency, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 229): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Map Content Dependencies Across Multiple Sources Automatically) differs from the folder (content-dependency-mapper)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 74 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3712 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 250: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 39 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 74 items
- +4Has examples (15 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.