AB socialclaw
Use when a user wants social media scheduling and publishing for AI agents on X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook Pages, TikTok, Discord, Telegram, YouTube, Reddit, WordPress, and Pinterest through SocialClaw.
As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
ProcedureDiscordTelegramYouTubeWordPressMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 85Steps. 83 steps, 3 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Failures and branches. 8 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1860 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 206: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 83 items
- +4Has examples (16 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
SocialClaw is a coherent social publishing skill, but it grants real posting and credential-handling authority with under-scoped invocation and insufficient safety guidance.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026