SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC agent-harness-architect

Agent Harness 架构设计师。基于通用框架 H=(E,T,C,S,L,V)+P 完成架构设计：澄清需求、吸收用户核心创意、给出专业方案、产出可直接编码的设计文档，并维护自进化知识库（agent harness 框架 + 跨领域设计模式）。触发场景：用户提出「设计 agent 架构」「帮我设计 harness」「@agent-harness」、只有一个 idea 想做成 agent、提供需求分析文档要求架构设计、或想评估/重构已有 agent 架构。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: hanli v1.0.2 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 699 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 13 h ago

Agent Harness 架构设计师。基于通用框架 H=(E,T,C,S,L,V)+P 完成架构设计：澄清需求、吸收用户核心创意、给出专业方案、产出可直接编码的设计文档，并维护自进化知识库（agent harness 框架 + 跨领域设计模式）。触发场景：用户提出「设计 agent 架构」「帮我设计…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name_en"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_en"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 51 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1699 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 231: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 23)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a Chinese-first architecture-design skill whose file writing and network use are disclosed, user-confirmed, and aligned with maintaining its own reference knowledge base.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 9 Sept 2026