SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF web-research-subagent

Web research and synthesis workflow for making an agent or subagent smarter before it acts. Use when a task requires current web knowledge, domain research, source evaluation, competitive/technical research, learning unfamiliar tools/frameworks, building research briefs, or delegating focused web lookups to subagents before implementation or advice.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Nevil Paul v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 099 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 48/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: URL

GeneratorAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
48/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: URL
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: URL

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: URL
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: URL
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
  • 100Steps. 38 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1099 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 351: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a coherent web-research workflow with clear source-evaluation guidance and no hidden install, credential, persistence, or destructive behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026