SKILLEMALL.ai

BD skill_gap_diagnosis

業務缺口診斷 Skill。整合業績、競賽、榮譽、續保率、客戶增長、技能短板等多維數據,統一換算為保障保費口徑,計算缺口金額、需成交件數、緊急度/容易度標籤,按優先級排序,輸出多維度診斷結論。不輸出行動建議。在用戶表達「診斷」、「分析」、「整體情況」、「缺口」、「進度」、「還差多少」或同時詢問多個維度業績時觸發。禁止在單一指標查詢、單一排名查詢、閒聊、意圖不明時觸發。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: NemoTech v1.0.0 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 470 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

業務缺口診斷…

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (skill_gap_diagnosis) differs from the folder (skill-gap-diagnosis)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 23 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 470 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 184: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly a disclosed insurance performance diagnostic tool, but it repeatedly contradicts its no-advice promise by generating sales and follow-up recommendations.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 16 Jun 2026