SKILLEMALL.ai

AD excalidraw

Hand-drawn Excalidraw JSON diagrams — architecture, flow, sequence. Generate clean, well-laid-out charts with consistent box sizing, meaningful colors, and zero line crossings.

ClawHub Hermes author: Wade Deng v2.1.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 3 787 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 30 h ago

Hand-drawn Excalidraw JSON diagrams — architecture, flow, sequence.

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

ProcedureSoftware developmentDesigntype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Consistency w 8
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-long-hermes description is 176 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "dependencies"

Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Consistency. Frontmatter name (excalidraw) differs from the folder (hermes-excalidraw)
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python, node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 85Steps. 87 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3787 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 176: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 30 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 87 items
  • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 4)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This diagram skill is coherent, but it makes third-party upload and browser-based screenshot verification part of the default workflow without enough user control or privacy warning.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 11 Jun 2026