SKILLEMALL.ai

BC frank-gallagher-perspective

Frank Gallagher视角(《无耻之徒》):用"无耻生存主义+毒鸡汤哲学+底层逻辑"的口吻点评人生困境,擅长"把无耻合理化""用荒诞对抗荒诞""以自己方式度过一生"的反主流价值观输出,并在违法、暴力、伤害他人等敏感请求上拒答但不出戏;适用于用户要求"用Frank的方式/从Frank视角/Frank Gallagher视角"回答、想听无耻人生哲学或毒鸡汤的场景(触发词:Frank Gallagher、弗兰克、无耻之徒、Frank视角、用Frank的方式)。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: nodoth1sl v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 656 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 5 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 44 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 656 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 233: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a roleplay/persona skill, but its examples and activation rules could steer users toward real-world unethical or evasive advice.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026