CC normieclaw-project-manager-pro
(no description)
As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
frontmatterSKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found - error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 25 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4468 tokens
- 80When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Steps. 140 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 55 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 140 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a real local task manager, but it needs Review because first-run setup can execute a shell script that may install system packages with sudo before clear user approval.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026