SKILLEMALL.ai

BC crypto-drt-scalping

Crypto DRT scalping — Dealing Range Theory on 12 crypto pairs (TRX, BNB, BTC, LINK, AVAX, DOGE, SOL, NEAR, XRP, LDO, ADA, ETH), all 7 days. Backtested 2 years (~400+ trades). Backtest results are historical and not a guarantee of future performance. Separate play-money account rules.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Northcap Group v1.0.10 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 1 304 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Crypto DRT scalping — Dealing Range Theory on 12 crypto pairs (TRX, BNB, BTC, LINK, AVAX, DOGE, SOL, NEAR, XRP, LDO, ADA, ETH), all 7 days.

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationSoftware developmentAI and agentsPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:114
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    - **Payment**: USDC on Ethereum to `0xaf…CF8`
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:131
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    - **Payment**: USDC on Ethereum to `0xaf…CF8`
    quoted

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 43 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1304 tokens
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 284: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a trading-plan skill with an optional paid signal client, but it needs Review because it can send a spending API key to a hard-coded remote service that charges per use.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 20 Aug 2026