AC webperf-core-web-vitals
Intelligent Core Web Vitals analysis with automated workflows and decision trees. Measures LCP, CLS, INP with guided debugging that automatically determines follow-up analysis based on results. Includes workflows for LCP deep dive (5 phases), CLS investigation (loading vs interaction), INP debugging (latency breakdown + attribution), and cross-skill integration with loading, interaction, and media skills. Use when the user asks about Core Web Vitals, LCP optimization, layout shifts, or interaction responsiveness. Compatible with Chrome DevTools MCP.
Intelligent Core Web Vitals analysis with automated workflows and decision trees.
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 119 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2394 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 555: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 24 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 119 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
- +3All 7 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.