AC webperf-loading
Intelligent loading performance analysis with automated workflows for TTFB investigation (DNS/connection/server breakdown), render-blocking detection, script performance deep dive (first vs third-party attribution), font optimization, and resource hints validation. Includes decision trees that automatically analyze TTFB sub-parts when slow, detect script loading anti-patterns (async/defer/preload conflicts), identify render-blocking resources, and validate resource hints usage. Features workflows for complete loading audit (6 phases), backend performance investigation, and priority optimization. Cross-skill integration with Core Web Vitals (LCP resource loading), Interaction (script execution blocking), and Media (lazy loading strategy). Use when the user asks about TTFB, FCP, render-blocking, slow loading, font performance, script optimization, or resource hints. Compatible with Chrome DevTools MCP.
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 32. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 115 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2514 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 913: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 27 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 115 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
- +3All 28 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.