AB webperf-media
Intelligent media optimization with automated workflows for images, videos, and SVGs. Includes decision trees that detect LCP images (triggers format/lazy-loading/priority analysis), identify layout shift risks (missing dimensions), and flag lazy loading issues (above-fold lazy or below-fold eager). Features workflows for complete media audit, LCP image investigation, video performance (poster optimization), and SVG embedded bitmap detection. Cross-skill integration with Core Web Vitals (LCP/CLS impact) and Loading (priority hints, resource preloading). Provides performance budgets and format recommendations based on content type. Use when the user asks about image optimization, LCP is an image/video, layout shifts from media, or media loading strategy. Compatible with Chrome DevTools MCP.
As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 161 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Failures and branches. 5 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2771 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 800: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 161 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.