SKILLEMALL.ai

AD claude-delegate

Delegate various coding tasks to Claude Code. Use this skill when you need assistance with code generation, bug fixing, feature implementation, code review, refactoring, or file exploration. It streamlines calling Claude Code for non-interactive execution, handling parameters like `--print --permission-mode bypassPermissions`. Triggers on phrases like 'write code for', 'fix this bug in', 'implement feature', 'review this pr', 'refactor', 'explore files for', 'debug', 'code task for claude'.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: splicer scorn v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 287 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Delegate various coding tasks to Claude Code.

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 75Steps. 3 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 287 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 495: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 3 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill openly delegates coding work to Claude Code, but it makes disabled permission checks the default for broad coding requests without clear safeguards.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 11 Sept 2026