SKILLEMALL.ai

BB verified-humanizer

Legacy verification-guided rewriting skill. Makes AI-generated text more natural while encouraging claims to stay grounded and attributable. Does not perform cryptographic verification, emit receipts, verify receipts, or prove that rewritten text is true.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: nutstrut v0.0.8 MIT-0 13 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 1 116 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
72/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100

  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 34 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1116 tokens
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 255: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill appears to be a local writing-rewrite helper with no evidence of hidden data transfer or destructive behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jul 2026