SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC kapsel

Project memory capsules — archive completed project knowledge to Google Drive and reload it on demand. Use this skill whenever the user mentions "Kapsel", "capsule", "project archive", "project memory", or wants to store, recall, or manage knowledge from completed projects. Also trigger when the user says things like "save this project", "archive this", "I'm done with this project", "load the old project", "what did we do on project X?", or "forget this project but keep the knowledge". Works with rclone and any cloud remote (Google Drive, OneDrive, S3, etc.).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Djamel Saric v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 974 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureGoogle DriveWriting and documentsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 9 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 974 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 10 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 565: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill has a legitimate project-archive purpose, but it needs review because it can upload project context and arbitrary files to cloud storage and its helper script uses unsafe shell command construction.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026