BB amc-setup-calibration-stack
Launch AutoMagicCalib microservice and web UI from NGC release images via Docker Compose. Use when user says 'deploy auto calibration', 'launch auto calibration', 'launch AMC', 'start MS+UI', or 'set up auto-magic-calib'. Requires NGC API key.
Launch AutoMagicCalib microservice and web UI from NGC release images via Docker Compose.
As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegeSKILL.md:246Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions# Get explicit user confirmation before running sudo chown — it recursively changes
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegeSKILL.md:255Privilege escalation / world-writable permissionssudo chown 1000:1000 -R projects
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegeSKILL.md:256Privilege escalation / world-writable permissionssudo chown 1000:1000 -R models
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "owner" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "service" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "reviewed"
Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 14 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3803 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 243: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.