AF tao-run-on-slurm
Remote SLURM GPU cluster execution over SSH with sbatch/srun, Pyxis/Enroot containers, and Lustre-backed results. Use when running TAO training/eval/inference jobs on an on-prem or DGX SLURM cluster. Trigger phrases include "run on SLURM", "submit sbatch", "DGX SLURM cluster", "Pyxis/Enroot container", "Lustre dataset".
Remote SLURM GPU cluster execution over SSH with sbatch/srun, Pyxis/Enroot containers, and Lustre-backed results.
As a process F 63/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/slurm-ssh-credentials.md, references/slurm-container-execution.md, references/slurm-execution-sdk.md
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Read Bash
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/slurm-ssh-credentials.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/slurm-container-execution.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/slurm-execution-sdk.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/slurm-preflight-storage.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/detailed-guide.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: references/slurm-ssh-credentials.md, references/slurm-container-execution.md, references/slurm-execution-sdk.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 45 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2765 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low The response is described with custom markup (12 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 321: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.