SKILLEMALL.ai

BD auto-skill-scanner

Auto Skill Scanner - 自动化AI技能安全监控工具。每日自动扫描已安装的OpenClaw技能,发现硬编码凭证、Shell注入、网络泄露等安全隐患,报告推送至Telegram/飞书等渠道。触发词:scan skills、扫描技能、安全扫描。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ohmanymoneygomyhome-creator v1.0.4 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 370 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceTelegramInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Exfiltration net-credential-use references/security-checks.md:17
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (documentation table row; documentation of a security skill)
    | Environment exfiltration | `os.environ[key]` → `requests.post()` | Sends secrets to external servers |
    tablesecurity skill

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 27 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 370 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -223 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 128: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill does what it advertises: it scans installed OpenClaw skills and sends recurring reports, with the main risks being disclosed automation and broad report delivery.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026