AD code-review-zh
代码审查助手，对代码进行全面审查，覆盖代码质量、潜在 Bug、性能问题、安全漏洞和可维护性。 适用于 PR 审查、代码重构前检查、新人代码辅导、技术方案评估等场景。解决"帮我看看这段代码有什么问题"、 "代码审查 / code review"、"找出代码中的 Bug"、"这个实现方案有什么风险"等需求。 支持 Python / Java / Go / JavaScript / TypeScript 等主流语言。
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 8 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 84 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 207: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 4 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
- +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a simple Chinese code-review skill that only asks to read code and provide review feedback.
LLM: benign (high) · 28 May 2026