SKILLEMALL.ai

BC email-cold-zh

专为销售与BD人员设计的陌生客户开发邮件生成工具,支持撰写简短有力、直击痛点的 开发信/cold email/BD邮件/客户开拓邮件。根据目标客户行业、职位与业务场景,自动 提炼核心价值主张,设计吸引眼球的主题行与行动号召(CTA),有效提升陌生邮件回复 率。适用于SaaS销售、企业服务BD、品牌合作、渠道拓展等多种陌生客户开发场景。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Olina1Ye v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 125 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceInfrastructureSales and CRMtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 6 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 125 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 168: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 4 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
  • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill bundle is mostly coherent maintainer tooling, but it deserves review because one helper defaults to launching a nested review agent with full sandbox bypass while other workflows can perform high-impact staff or production actions.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026