SKILLEMALL.ai

AC aliyun-oidc-cert-renew

用 GitHub Actions + 阿里云 RAM OIDC 自动续期 Let's Encrypt 通配证书并分发到 OSS/FC/CDN,仓库零长期 AK。覆盖 OIDC 提供商/角色/权限策略搭建、workflow 手动兑换临时 STS、ACME DNS-01 签发、CAS 上传复用、新子域 DNS 自动发现绑定、60 天 keepalive、状态持久化,以及 IMS/RAM/CAS/oss2 SDK 的全部命名坑。当用户说「自动续期证书」「不想存 AK」「GitHub Actions 操作阿里云」「SSL 证书过期」「新增子域自动上 HTTPS」「免密钥访问阿里云」时使用。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: robin v0.1.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 2 446 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 11 h ago

用 GitHub Actions + 阿里云 RAM OIDC 自动续期 Let's Encrypt 通配证书并分发到 OSS/FC/CDN,仓库零长期 AK。覆盖 OIDC 提供商/角色/权限策略搭建、workflow 手动兑换临时 STS、ACME DNS-01 签发、CAS 上传复用、新子域 DNS…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 27 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2446 tokens
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (9 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 294: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill appears purpose-built for Alibaba Cloud certificate automation, but its defaults can grant broad cloud access and overly broad GitHub OIDC trust, so it should be reviewed before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 13 Sept 2026