SKILLEMALL.ai

AB multi-paper-innovation-comparator

Compare innovations across multiple academic papers in a folder and produce a rolling summ document. Use when Codex needs to batch-read up to 20 paper files, summarize each paper's innovations and main work, compare each newly read paper against all previously read papers, reread related papers, and synthesize possible combined research directions or further innovation points.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: orbisz v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 199 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Compare innovations across multiple academic papers in a folder and produce a rolling summ document.

As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorSoftware developmentWriting and documentsResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
73/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 26 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1199 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 379: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This paper-comparison skill is mostly local and purpose-aligned, but it also tells the agent to keep failure diaries and pursue changes to its own instructions, which deserves review before installation.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026