SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF paper-innov-compare

多篇科研论文创新点对比与交叉研究方向挖掘。当用户需要对一个文件夹内的多篇论文进行批量总结、逐篇对比、挖掘可结合的创新研究方向时使用此skill。触发场景："对比这些论文"、"分析这些论文的创新点"、"多篇论文对比"、"找找这些论文可以结合的点"、"论文横向对比"、"compare these papers"、"cross-paper analysis"。文件夹内论文数量不超过20篇。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: orbisz v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 066 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

多篇科研论文创新点对比与交叉研究方向挖掘。当用户需要对一个文件夹内的多篇论文进行批量总结、逐篇对比、挖掘可结合的创新研究方向时使用此skill。触发场景："对比这些论文"、"分析这些论文的创新点"、"多篇论文对比"、"找找这些论文可以结合的点"、"论文横向对比"、"compare these…

As a process F 28/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/create_compare_docx.py

AnalyzerWordSoftware developmentWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
28/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/create_compare_docx.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/create_compare_docx.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 28/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/create_compare_docx.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/create_compare_docx.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (paper-innov-compare) differs from the folder (paper-innov-compare-skill)
  • 100Steps. 44 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1066 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 193: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches paper comparison, but it also instructs agents to run commands and write files without confirmation and includes a self-modification workflow.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026