SKILLEMALL.ai

BD sith-choir

Cross-model intellect relay across a mesh of stored API keys (multi-provider, multi-key). The conductor farms work out to a choir of models reachable via EVERY stored credential — each provider's api_key and each alt_api_keys entry is its own health-tracked voice with automatic per-key failover — and models that need help are answered using other providers' keys (e.g. a Mistral-key model that is rate-limited or unsure consults Gemini and llm7.io keys). Core moves: (1) weak/cheap models sing candidates in parallel and a reasoning model aggregates them (Mixture-of-Agents, arXiv:2406.04692); (2) vision relay — text-only callers hand images to vision-capable voices (arXiv:2502.16428); (3) mandatory escalation — low confidence, errors or rate limits route to a reasoning court from other providers (FrugalGPT cascade, arXiv:2305.05176); (4) judge panels score 0-10 and a persistent reward ledger punishes weak voices while key-health cooldowns rotate load (arXiv:2306.05685). Plus self-consistency voting (`consensus`, weighted plurality with abstention, arXiv:2203.11171 + 2502.06233), an independent adversarial `verify` round, a verifier revision loop (`refine`, Reflexion arXiv:2303.11366), calibration-driven self-improvement (`calibrate`), multi-turn memory (`--session`), exact-question answer caching, provider cache-read token accounting + `--budget`, provenance `runs`/`report` with latency, task `--lane` routing, `--plan` dry-run, machine-readable `--json` everywhere, and offline `selftest`. Use when you hold many API keys and want every one contributing, or when one model cannot do the whole job alone.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: orionshaowswmw v1.3.0 MIT-0 6 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 867 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

Cross-model intellect relay across a mesh of stored API keys (multi-provider, multi-key).

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationResearchAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
80/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
50
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Shorten the description to 1024 characters.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error description-long description is 1623 chars, limit 1024
  • note description-budget description takes 1623 of the ~15000-char shared budget for all skills
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "id"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "dependencies"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "host_compatibility"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "categories"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "topics"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "invariants"

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 32 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2867 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 1623: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 50.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly transparent about routing prompts through many model API keys, but its custom endpoint support can forward credentials and content to arbitrary configured URLs without enough validation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 9 Sept 2026