BD sith-choir
Cross-model intellect relay across a mesh of stored API keys (multi-provider, multi-key). The conductor farms work out to a choir of models reachable via EVERY stored credential — each provider's api_key and each alt_api_keys entry is its own health-tracked voice with automatic per-key failover — and models that need help are answered using other providers' keys (e.g. a Mistral-key model that is rate-limited or unsure consults Gemini and llm7.io keys). Core moves: (1) weak/cheap models sing candidates in parallel and a reasoning model aggregates them (Mixture-of-Agents, arXiv:2406.04692); (2) vision relay — text-only callers hand images to vision-capable voices (arXiv:2502.16428); (3) mandatory escalation — low confidence, errors or rate limits route to a reasoning court from other providers (FrugalGPT cascade, arXiv:2305.05176); (4) judge panels score 0-10 and a persistent reward ledger punishes weak voices while key-health cooldowns rotate load (arXiv:2306.05685). Plus self-consistency voting (`consensus`, weighted plurality with abstention, arXiv:2203.11171 + 2502.06233), an independent adversarial `verify` round, a verifier revision loop (`refine`, Reflexion arXiv:2303.11366), calibration-driven self-improvement (`calibrate`), multi-turn memory (`--session`), exact-question answer caching, provider cache-read token accounting + `--budget`, provenance `runs`/`report` with latency, task `--lane` routing, `--plan` dry-run, machine-readable `--json` everywhere, and offline `selftest`. Use when you hold many API keys and want every one contributing, or when one model cannot do the whole job alone.
Cross-model intellect relay across a mesh of stored API keys (multi-provider, multi-key).
As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Shorten the description to 1024 characters.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
description-longdescription is 1623 chars, limit 1024 - note
description-budgetdescription takes 1623 of the ~15000-char shared budget for all skills - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "id" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "dependencies" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "host_compatibility" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "categories" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "topics" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "invariants"
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 32 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2867 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 1623: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 50.