BB haircut
The barber for your coding agents' config. Weighs everything every agent on this machine loads (instruction files, memory, MCP servers, hooks, skills, commands, subagents, plugins, leftovers), prices each item in tokens from your own transcripts, and parks the dead weight with a receipt and an undo. Use this skill whenever the user mentions config bloat, a heavy or slow session start, tokens burned before the first word, too many MCP servers, hooks that are slow or fire on every prompt, skills or commands or plugins nobody invokes, cleaning up or auditing CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, Codex config, or asks what does my agent actually load, why is my context full before I type, which of these servers can I turn off, or what is this plugin costing me. Use it even when they only say the session feels bloated or startup got slow, and even when they mention /context, /doctor or /skill-doctor.
The barber for your coding agents' config.
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Bash Read Write AskUserQuestion Glob Grep
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Failures and branches. 5 branches
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 19 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2097 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 894: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.