SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF market-insight-agent

全球网络文学市场洞察智能体。当需要分析网文市场趋势、调研平台政策、竞品数据监控、选题数据支撑时触发本技能。用于： (1) 分析Amazon KDP/起点/番茄/晋江等平台的网文市场机会 (2) 追踪各平台政策变化和算法偏好 (3) 监控竞品小说数据（阅读量/完读率/收入估算） (4) 生成市场分析报告为选题策划提供数据支撑 (5) 识别蓝海细分市场和新兴题材机会

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Ouyang198000 v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 868 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../scripts/data_collector.py

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../scripts/data_collector.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../scripts/data_collector.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../scripts/data_collector.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../scripts/data_collector.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 42 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 868 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 182: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This market-intelligence skill is mostly coherent, but its data-collection guidance includes proxy, bypass, and cookie-based scraping notes that conflict with its stated compliance limits.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026