BC topic-planner-agent
选题策划智能体。当需要生成小说选题、评估市场机会、设计卖点钩子、制定创作约束时触发本技能。用于：(1) 基于市场洞察师的数据生成备选选题 (2) 对选题进行多维度评分和ROI估算 (3) 设计核心卖点、开篇钩子、节奏大纲 (4) 输出标准选题策划文档给小说创作师 (5) 竞品对标分析和差异化定位
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 452 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 148: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
The artifact appears to be a coherent ClawHub maintainer/developer skill set with disclosed repo, review, UI proof, Convex, and moderation workflows rather than hidden or unrelated behavior.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026