SKILLEMALL.ai

BC six-dim-evaluator

L4 评估层 - 六维评估引擎。自动化执行六维评估(T/C/O/E/M/U),生成评估报告,提供改进建议。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: pagoda v0.1.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 855 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
83/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 5

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 5
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:278
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "integrity": "sha5…ywo+qwL+oL8H…C1U+vRfLQDvw==",
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:294
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha512-Yqfm+XDx0+Prh3…1yC+JWZ2…IL7+vK+Clp7…D7g==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:307
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…xZl+RoGR…fbT/ZgrF…0EA==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:320
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…3bJ+V0If…IXN+CL65…a4w==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:336
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "integrity": "sha5…H47+FFon…OsV/4+RRsz…0ig==",
    quoted

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "origin"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 43 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 855 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 53: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -218 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 31 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a real evaluator skill, but it asks for broad execution/data-handling authority while its scoring and retention behavior are under-scoped.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026