SKILLEMALL.ai

AC code-runner

Run code snippets in 30+ programming languages including JavaScript, Python, TypeScript, Java, C, C++, Go, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and more. Use when the user wants to execute code, test algorithms, verify output, run scripts, or check code behavior. Supports both interpreted and compiled languages.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: panchenbo v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 315 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: code-runner (ClawHub)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-execpolicy-bypass scripts/run-code.cjs:50
      Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      powershell: { executor: process.platform === 'win32' ? 'powershell -ExecutionPolicy ByPass -File' : 'pwsh -File', ext: 'ps1' },
      quoted

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (code-runner) differs from the folder (code-runner-local)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 37 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1315 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 293: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill openly functions as a local multi-language code runner, but any code it runs has the same access as the user running it.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026