SKILLEMALL.ai

BF vibelock

VibeLock - AI 开发者安全商业化 Skill。覆盖全语言全架构:代码加密/混淆/打包安装包/授权分发/防破解/攻防测试引导,以及 VibeLock 平台协同(授权 API 激活与心跳、Ed25519 验签、防篡改存储、到期提醒续费、遥测上报、Open API 自动化维护)。提供 A/B/C/D 四级保护方案(方案 D 极致保护全开源免费,AI 自动生成 C 代码),纯对话引导零本地依赖。当用户提到加密、上锁、打包、授权、防破解、安全加固、安装包、license、activation、code protection、obfuscation、packaging、anti-debug 等关键词时使用。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: PandLeeAI v0.1.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 19 694 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

VibeLock - AI 开发者安全商业化 Skill。覆盖全语言全架构:代码加密/混淆/打包安装包/授权分发/防破解/攻防测试引导,以及 VibeLock 平台协同(授权 API 激活与心跳、Ed25519 验签、防篡改存储、到期提醒续费、遥测上报、Open API 自动化维护)。提供 A/B/C/D…

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
61
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 19694 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 10Execution cost. Instruction body is 19694 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (vibelock) differs from the folder (vibelock-skill)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 74 steps
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2100 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 307: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 92 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 74 items
  • +4Has examples (88 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill’s main goal is coherent, but it gives itself broad update, file-modification, credential-reuse, and platform-management powers without enough user control.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 10 Aug 2026