SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF html-report-generator

会自己设计PPT的智能报告技能，内置47套PPT模板（商务、科技、创意、学术、政府、金融等全场景覆盖），根据主题风格自由选配模板并自主设计，将任意输入拆解为5-15页精美HTML报告，每页严格1017×720px对齐PPT画布。当用户说"生成报告"、"分析内容做成页面"、"做成HTML"、"内容可视化"时立即使用，无需确认直接生成。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: panhongwei v1.0.1 MIT-0 80 files body ≈ 595 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 8 d ago

会自己设计PPT的智能报告技能，内置47套PPT模板（商务、科技、创意、学术、政府、金融等全场景覆盖），根据主题风格自由选配模板并自主设计，将任意输入拆解为5-15页精美HTML报告，每页严格1017×720px对齐PPT画布。当用户说"生成报告"、"分析内容做成页面"、"做成HTML"、"内容可视化"时立即使用，无…

As a process F 34/100 · No process to follow — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

GeneratorData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
34/100
No process to follow
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 34/100

  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (html-report-generator) differs from the folder (html-ppt-generator)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 595 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 167: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 11)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a mostly coherent HTML/PPT report generator, but it needs review because its normal workflow can use the web, mutate persistent style files, and reference an undeclared local Node screenshot command without clear user control.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026