AB aws-service-chaos-research
Use when the user asks about chaos engineering, fault injection, resilience testing, or HA verification for a SPECIFIC AWS service (e.g., RDS, EKS, MSK, ElastiCache, DynamoDB, S3, Lambda, OpenSearch, etc.). Triggers on "chaos testing on [service]", "fault injection for [service]", "how to test HA of [service]", "FIS scenarios/actions for [service]", "[service] failover testing", "[service] resilience testing", "[service] 混沌测试", "[service] 故障注入", "[service] 高可用验证", "对 [service] 做混沌实验", "test my [service]", "verify my [service] is resilient". Use this skill even when the user phrases it casually like "test my RDS" or "how resilient is my MSK cluster".
g., RDS, EKS, MSK, ElastiCache, DynamoDB, S3, Lambda, OpenSearch, etc.). Triggers on "chaos testing on [service]", "fault injection for [service]", "how to…
As a process B 78/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 78/100
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4785 tokens
- 85Steps. 78 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 14 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 657: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 24 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 78 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.