SKILLEMALL.ai

CD 诉讼文书起草

专为诉讼律师、法务设计的 AI 文书起草助手。告别“对着空白文档发呆”和“满世界找模板”的痛苦。只需输入案件事实与己方立场(或直接丢入对方起诉状/证据目录),AI 将为你定制起草结构严谨的起诉状、答辩状、质证意见或律师函初稿。每一项诉讼主张和答辩理由,AI 都会自动为你匹配现行有效的法条及类案参考。直接输出可编辑的 Markdown/Word 格式,律师稍作修改即可定稿,大幅节省案头撰写时间。 Triggers: 起草答辩状、起草质证意见、起草律师函、起草起诉状、起草上诉状、draft litigation document

ClawHub Agent Skills author: panting09266-ai v1.0.8 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 234 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 6 d ago

专为诉讼律师、法务设计的 AI 文书起草助手。告别“对着空白文档发呆”和“满世界找模板”的痛苦。只需输入案件事实与己方立场(或直接丢入对方起诉状/证据目录),AI 将为你定制起草结构严谨的起诉状、答辩状、质证意见或律师函初稿。每一项诉讼主张和答辩理由,AI 都会自动为你匹配现行有效的法条及类案参考。直接输出可编辑的…

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorLegalCustomer supportSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (诉讼文书起草) differs from the folder (cue-litigation-drafting)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, git) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 9 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1234 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 265: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears to support legal drafting, but it asks for sensitive legal data and credentials while silently installing and running unpinned third-party code.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 15 Sept 2026