SKILLEMALL.ai

BD cue-litigation-drafting

诉讼文书起草 — 根据用户提供的案件事实与当事人立场,通过 Cue 服务端生成法律文书草稿(答辩状/质证意见/律师函),逐点附法条与类案依据。本技能调用 Cue API(cuecue.cn)完成远程检索与生成,不直接访问任何数据源。 Triggers: 起草答辩状、起草质证意见、起草律师函、起草起诉状、起草上诉状、draft litigation document

ClawHub Agent Skills author: panting09266-ai v1.0.7 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 184 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

诉讼文书起草 — 根据用户提供的案件事实与当事人立场,通过 Cue 服务端生成法律文书草稿(答辩状/质证意见/律师函),逐点附法条与类案依据。本技能调用 Cue API(cuecue.cn)完成远程检索与生成,不直接访问任何数据源。 Triggers…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationWordLegalCustomer supporttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, git, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 13 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1184 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 183: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill’s legal-drafting purpose is coherent, but it asks users to run mutable external code and send sensitive litigation materials to an outside service without strong scoping or privacy disclosure.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Sept 2026