AC cursor-cloud-agents
Deploy Cursor AI agents to GitHub repos. Automatically write code, generate tests, create documentation, and open PRs using your existing Cursor subscription.
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
GeneratorGitHubInfrastructureAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcREADME.md:103Writes to a shell startup file (detector / deny-list definition)echo 'source ~/.openclaw/workspace/projects/cursor-cloud-agents/scripts/cca-aliases.sh' >> ~/.bashrc
detector
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "requirements" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "security"
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 57 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3692 tokens
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 158: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 48 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 57 items
- +4Has examples (39 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a disclosed Cursor Cloud Agents wrapper with real account and repository impact, but the sensitive behavior is aligned with its stated purpose.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026