SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC statichub

Deploy AI-generated static assets with StaticHub CLI. Use when a user wants to publish files with `statichub deploy <path>`, where `<path>` must be an explicit non-empty directory or a non-empty `.html` file.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 白泽 v0.1.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 245 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell-known-host SKILL.md:24
      Pipe-to-shell installer from a well-known host (still executes remote code) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      - `curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Patrick0308/statichub/main/scripts/install.sh | sh`
      quoted

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
    • 100Steps. 17 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 245 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 208: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 4 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill has a clear static-site deployment purpose, but it tells the agent to install its CLI by running an unverified remote shell script.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026