AF gpt-image-edit
Edit images with OpenAI GPT Image 2 (the `/edit` endpoint of ChatGPT Images 2.0) on RunComfy — bundled with the model's documented prompting patterns so the skill gets sharper output than naive prompting against the same model. Documents GPT Image Edit's strengths (preservation language, multilingual in-image text editing, multi-reference up to 10 images, layout / typography precision), the schema, and when to route to Nano Banana Edit / Flux Kontext / GPT Image 2 t2i instead. Calls `runcomfy run openai/gpt-image-2/edit` through the local RunComfy CLI. Triggers on "gpt image edit", "gpt-image-edit", "chatgpt image edit", "edit with gpt image 2", or any explicit ask to edit with this model.
Edit images with OpenAI GPT Image 2 (the /edit endpoint of ChatGPT Images 2.0) on RunComfy — bundled with the model's documented prompting patterns so the…
As a process F 49/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../gpt-image-2
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../gpt-image-2 - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "emoji" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "clawdis"
Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../gpt-image-2
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 17 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2127 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 698: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.