AC runcomfy-cli
RunComfy CLI on RunComfy. The `runcomfy` CLI is one binary, one auth, hundreds of RunComfy model endpoints — image generation on RunComfy, image edit on RunComfy, video generation on RunComfy, image-to-video on RunComfy, lip-sync, face swap, video edit, inpainting, outpainting, extend, ControlNet, relight, upscale, LoRA training. Submit a request, poll, download the output. This RunComfy CLI skill teaches install, authentication, schema discovery, invoke, polling / no-wait modes, JSON output for scripting, exit codes, and error handling. Triggers on "runcomfy cli", "install runcomfy", "runcomfy login", "runcomfy run", "runcomfy whoami", "runcomfy api", or any explicit ask to call a RunComfy model from script or terminal.
RunComfy CLI on RunComfy.
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "emoji" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "clawdis"
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 16 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2942 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 730: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 18 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.