AC video-inpainting
Region edits across video frames on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI — remove an object that appears across many frames, clean up wires or watermarks, replace a region with matching motion. Routes across Wan 2-7 edit-video (default, prompt-driven region edits with spatial language), Lucy Edit Restyle (identity-stable region-aware restyle), and Seedream 4-0 edit-sequential (when treating the clip as a frame stack). Picks the right route based on whether the change is prose-driven, identity-locked, or needs frame-by-frame still inpaint chained into a video. Triggers on "video inpaint", "video inpainting", "remove from video", "mask region in video", "clean up video", "remove object from clip", "video patch", "frame-by-frame edit", "remove watermark from video", "remove passing person", or any explicit ask to edit a region across video frames.
Region edits across video frames on RunComfy via the runcomfy CLI — remove an object that appears across many frames, clean up wires or watermarks, replace a…
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "emoji" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "clawdis"
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 27 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2140 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 851: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 10 example trigger phrases
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.