SKILLEMALL.ai

AB adaptive-socratic-questioning

自适应苏格拉底式追问技能 / Adaptive Socratic Questioning - Use adaptive follow-up questioning to deepen student reasoning and uncover misconceptions. Use when the user needs to guide students through deeper thinking, wants to develop critical thinking skills, asks about questioning techniques, needs to scaffold complex topics, wants to identify student misconceptions, mentions Socratic method, or needs to build reasoning chains.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: perpetualhui v1.1.0 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 1 913 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: failures and branches, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
73/100
Nearly there
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 59 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1913 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • medium 5 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
    • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 420: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 25 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 59 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is an instruction-only education skill for Socratic questioning, with broad trigger wording but no hidden execution, data access, or privileged behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026